Why can't we solve the Amelia Earhart mystery?

The Hunt Continues

With so many pieces of evidence -- including human remains -- why does the mystery of Amelia Earhart remain unsolved?

Perhaps the biggest obstacle to discovery is the vast geographic area in which Earhart's plane might conceivably be found. No one can be certain exactly where Earhart's plane went down because of the loss of radio contact during the flight and the limiting effect of overcast skies on celestial navigation. Combing a quarter of a million square miles of ocean immediately following the disappearance yielded exactly nothing for the Navy. While subsequent efforts have focused on smaller areas, the searchable canvass remains massive, often on the order of 1,000 square miles (2,590 square kilometers).

The area's marine topography makes what's already a needle in a haystack job even more difficult: Pacific atolls rise up suddenly from the depths and are surrounded by steep shelves that lead to the ocean floor. Meanwhile, human error has also helped thwart the search for definitive proof. The human remains found on Gardner Island were lost after being examined by a doctor in the early 1940s. That rules out the definitive DNA matching technology that would likely determine conclusively whether the bones are Earhart's. (Forensic anthropologists looked at the doctor's notes in the 1990s and determined that the bones probably belonged to a woman of European descent) [source: Thurman].

These obstacles haven't deterred Earhart fans and aviation geeks from continuing their quest for answers. TIGHAR is set to launch a 30-day expedition in mid-September 2014 exploring the waters around Nikumaroro Island in an oceanographic research ship. Searchers plan to deploy two human-operated submersibles from the ship to capture detailed photo and video images of a 1-mile (1.6 kilometer) search area. At the same time, another team will comb the island's beachfront and forest in search of remnants from what might have been Earhart and Noonan's campsite [sources: Bennett-Smith, TIGHAR].

Searchers have continued to find significant clues. In 2013, TIGHAR announced that it had used sonar imaging to uncover evidence of a 22-foot (7-meter) object that may be a piece of Earhart's aircraft. Resting 600 feet (183 meters) below the surface of the Pacific Ocean and west of Nikumaroro, the image resembles the fuselage of Earhart's Lockheed Electra [source: Bennett-Smith].

There's good reason to believe that all or most of the plane remains intact. An hour before their last transmission, Earhart told the Coast Guard she and Noonan were flying at a low altitude, around 1,000 feet (304 meters). At around 100 miles per hour (161 kph), the Lockheed Electra could conceivably have maintained its integrity. If it did, the plane may still be in perfect shape, preserved in the oxygen-deprived depths of the South Pacific. Perhaps sooner rather than later we'll get to the bottom of the mystery surrounding Earhart's disappearance.

Author's Note: Why can't we solve the Amelia Earhart mystery?

When reading about Amelia Earhart's disappearance and the longstanding search for clues to her fate, I (Chris) can't help but start singing "In the Aeroplane Over the Sea," the title track from Neutral Milk Hotel's critically acclaimed 1998 album. I also can't help but think about how frontman Jeff Mangum's Earhart-like disappearance from the stage after the album's release has helped him cash in on the album's steadily increasing popularity 15 years later. Mangum became an indie rock hermit of sorts following the critical success of the band's second album, popping up every once in a while to play a song or two or host a radio show. In the meantime, the legend of Neutral Milk Hotel grew. Last year, Mangum decided to come out of hiding. Since then, he and his bandmates have been playing sold-out shows around the world as listeners young and old flock to hear tracks from a little album recorded when many of them were in grade school. Maybe Earhart's just holding out for a good deal.

Related Articles


  • Bennett-Smith, Meredith. "Amelia Earhart Plane Found? Sonar Image of Possible Wreckage May Suggest Earhart Died on Island." Huffington Post. May 30, 2013. (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/30/amelia-earhart-plane-found-sonar_n_3360141.html
  • Bennett-Smith, Meredith. "Amelia Earhart Search Update: Investigation of Possible Crash Site To Resume in 2014." Huffington Post. Oct. 16, 2013. (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/16/amelia-earhart-search-resume-2014_n_4107310.html
  • Encyclopedia Britannica. "Howland Island." (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/273578/Howland-Island
  • Heller, Jake. "8 Crazy Theories About Aviator Amelia Earhart's Demise." The Daily Beast. March 21, 2012. (Jan. 12, 2014). http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/21/8-crazy-conspiracy-theories-about-aviator-amelia-earhart-s-demise.html
  • Irene-Amelia.com. "A few odd rumors about Irene-Amelia." (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.irene-amelia.com/id80.html
  • Jordan, Jim. "Did Amelia Earhart crash by remote Pacific Island?" Seattle Times. Oct. 8, 2007. (Jan. 12, 2014) http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/travel/2003933699_webearhart08.html
  • King, Tom. "Exploring Amelia Earhart's Disappearance." Huffington Post. Jan. 11, 2014. (Jan. 16, 2014) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-king/exploring-amelia-earharts-disappearance_b_4581713.html
  • Manning, Stephen. "Explorer looks for Amelia Earhart's plane." Associated Press. Dec. 20, 2004. (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.livescience.com/history/earhart_search_041220.html
  • The Family of Amelia Earhart. "Biography." (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.ameliaearhart.com/about/bio.html
  • Thurman, Judith. "The life of Amelia Earhart." The New Yorker. Sept. 14, 2009. (Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2009/09/14/090914crat_atlarge_thurman?currentPage=1
  • TIGHAR. "Does the site fit Gallagher's description?"(Jan. 12, 2014) http://www.tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/Research/Bulletins/33_SevenMysteries/gallagher.html